Archivo de la etiqueta: USA

How China Profits From Our Junk

How China Profits From Our Junk

In this excerpt from the forthcoming Junkyard Planetauthor Adam Minter explores China’s central role in the world’s vast global recycling trade.
Nov 1 2013,
A Shanghai scrap yard (Adam Minter) 

China’s reputation as the “world’s factory” is well-established. But what happens to everything the world throws away? Since 2002, the Shanghai-based journalist Adam Minter has sought to find out. The son and grandson of scrap metalists, Minter traveled throughout the world to investigate how what we discard—and reuse—helps drive the global economy.

Minter, who has written for a variety of publications (including both the print and digital versions of The Atlantic), now writes a weekly column on China for Bloomberg. In this excerpt from his forthcoming book Junkyard Planet, which will be published by Bloomsbury Press on November 12,  Minter travels to the epicenter of the global scrape trade: southern China.

Sigue leyendo

Etiquetado , , , , , , , ,

Las pantallas viejas, un grave problema para el reciclado

Las pantallas viejas, un grave problema para el reciclado

El paso de los viejos equipos con tubos de rayos catódicos a los modelos modelos LED o LCD generaron un aluvión de basura electrónica con componentes tóxicos que exceden la capacidad de las plantas recicladoras

Por Ian Urbina  | The New York Times

Los monitores y televisores con tubo representan una de las más serias amenazas a la industria del reciclado de componentes electrónicos, debido a la toxicidad de sus partes. Foto: AFP 

El año último, dos inspectores de la agencia de residuos peligrosos de California visitaban a una empresa de reciclaje de artefactos electrónicos cerca de Fresno para llevar a cabo una revisión rutinaria de documentos cuando se encontraron con un almacén, del tamaño de una cancha de fútbol, repleto de decenas de miles de viejos monitores de computadora y televisores.

Las cajas de cartón que se desmoronaban, apiladas en filas tambaleantes de casi tres metros de altura y cuatro metros de profundidad, ocupaban tanto espacio que los inspectores necesitaron teléfonos celulares para comunicarse entre ellos. La capa de cristales rotos en el suelo y el polvo cargado de plomo en el aire eran tan densos que los inspectores pronto abandonaron el sitio debido a preocupaciones de seguridad. Semanas más tarde, el dueño de la empresa de reciclaje desapareció, abandonando los residuos, y dejando atrás un riesgo de toxicidad y un costoso trabajo de limpieza para el Estado y el propietario del almacén.

Hasta hace pocos años, los monitores y los televisores rotos, como aquellos apilados en el almacén, se reciclaban de manera rentable. Los embudos grandes y vidriosos dentro de estas máquinas, conocidos como tubos de rayos catódicos (CRT, por su sigla en idioma inglés) eran fundidos y usados para hacer nuevos tubos.

Sigue leyendo

Etiquetado , , , , , , , ,

Unwanted Electronic Gear Rising in Toxic Piles

Mark Makela for The New York Times


Last year, two inspectors from California’s hazardous waste agency were visiting an electronics recycling company near Fresno for a routine review of paperwork when they came across a warehouse the size of a football field, packed with tens of thousands of old computer monitors and televisions.

Stephanie Diani for The New York Times

ON THE TRAIL Members of an environmental group worked with researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to place tracking devices in cathode ray tubes bound for American recycling companies.

The crumbling cardboard boxes, stacked in teetering rows, 9 feet high and 14 feet deep, were so sprawling that the inspectors needed cellphones to keep track of each other. The layer of broken glass on the floor and the lead-laden dust in the air was so thick that the inspectors soon left over safety concerns. Weeks later, the owner of the recycling company disappeared, abandoning the waste, and leaving behind a toxic hazard and a costly cleanup for the state and the warehouse’s owner.

As recently as a few years ago, broken monitors and televisions like those piled in the warehouse were being recycled profitably. The big, glassy funnels inside these machines — known as cathode ray tubes, or CRTs — were melted down and turned into new ones.

But flat-screen technology has made those monitors and televisions obsolete, decimating the demand for the recycled tube glass used in them and creating what industry experts call a “glass tsunami” as stockpiles of the useless material accumulate across the country.

The predicament has highlighted how small changes in the marketplace can suddenly transform a product into a liability and demonstrates the difficulties that federal and state environmental regulators face in keeping up with these rapid shifts.

“Lots of smaller recyclers are in over their heads, and the risk that they might abandon their stockpiles is very real,” said Jason Linnell of the Electronics Recycling Coordination Clearinghouse, an organization that represents state environmental regulators, electronics manufacturers and recyclers. In February, the group sent a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency asking for immediate help dealing with the rapidly growing stockpiles of the glass, much of which contains lead.

With so few buyers of the leaded glass from the old monitors and televisions, recyclers have collected payments from states and electronics companies to get rid of the old machines. A small number of recyclers have developed new technology for cleaning the lead from the tube glass, but the bulk of this waste is being stored, sent to landfills or smelters, or disposed of in other ways that experts say are environmentally destructive.

In 2004, recyclers were paid more than $200 a ton to provide glass from these monitors for use in new cathode ray tubes. The same companies now have to pay more than $200 a ton to get anyone to take the glass off their hands.

So instead of recycling the waste, many recyclers have been storing millions of the monitors in warehouses, according to industry officials and experts. The practice is sometimes illegal since there are federal limits on how long a company can house the tubes, which are environmentally dangerous. Each one can include up to eight pounds of lead.

The scrap metal industry estimates that the amount of electronic waste has more than doubled in the past five years.

A little over a decade ago, there were at least 12 plants in the United States and 13 more worldwide that were taking these old televisions and monitors and using the cathode ray tube glass to produce new tubes. But now, there are only two plants in India doing this work.

In 2009, after television broadcasters turned off their analog signals nationwide in favor of digital, millions of people threw away their old televisions and replaced them with sleeker flat-screen models. Since then, thousands of pounds of old televisions and other electronic waste have been surreptitiously unloaded at landfills in Nevada and Ohio and on roadsides in California and Maine.

Most experts say that the larger solution to the growing electronic waste problem is for technology companies to design products that last longer, use fewer toxic components and are more easily recycled. Much of the industry, however, seems to be heading in the opposite direction.

Cathode ray tubes have been largely replaced by flat panels that use fluorescent lights with highly toxic mercury in them, said Jim Puckett, director of Basel Action Network, an environmental advocacy group. Used panel screens from LCD televisions and monitors, for example, do not have much recycling value, so many recyclers are sending them to landfills.

State and federal environmental policies have also become victims of their own success. Over the past decade, environmental regulators have promoted “take-back” programs to persuade people to hand in the more than 200 million old televisions and broken computer monitors that Americans are thought to have stored away in closets, garages and basements.

The same programs have courted businesses to divert their electronic waste away from landfills to avoid the hazardous chemicals in this toxic trash from leaching into groundwater. More than 290,000 tons of the high-tech castoffs are now directed away from landfills and toward recyclers each year.

“The problem now is that the collection of this waste has never been higher, but demand for the glass that comes from it has never been lower,” said Neil Peters-Michaud, the chief executive of Cascade Asset Management, a recycling company.

Roughly 660 million pounds of the glass is being stored in warehouses across the country, and it will cost $85 million to $360 million to responsibly recycle it, according to a report released in December by TransparentPlanet, an organization focused on electronic waste research.

The stockpiling problem is especially worrisome to electronics companies and to state and federal officials since they might have to pick up part of the tab if the stockpiles were abandoned and declared federal Superfund sites.

At least 22 states have laws that make electronics manufacturers like Sony, Toshiba and Apple financially responsible for recycling their old products. But lack of oversight of these programs has led to rampant fraud. In one tactic, quietly known in the industry as “paper transactions,” recyclers buy paperwork to indicate that they collected a certain amount of electronic waste that they never actually collected.

The Obama administration, more than any of its predecessors, has strengthened oversight of electronic waste. In 2012, the General Services Administration enacted rules discouraging all agencies and federal contractors from disposing of it in landfills. The federal government, which is among the world’s largest producer of electronic waste, disposes more than 10,000 computers a week on average.

Federal agencies are failing to sufficiently track their electronic waste, and large amounts of it are still being disposed of through public or online auctions, according to a Government Accountability Office report last year. In these auctions, the waste is often sold to a first layer of contractors who promise to handle it appropriately, only to have the most toxic portion subsequently sold to subcontractors who move it around as they wish.

Some of this waste is dumped illegally in developing countries, the G.A.O. found. Congress is considering legislation to ban certain types of unprocessed and nonworking electronics and electronic waste from being exported to developing countries from the United States.

Recyclers say there is still money to be made on processing the old monitors and televisions if companies charge a price that more genuinely reflects the expense of disposing of the glass properly. But practices like “greenwashing,” whereby companies pretend to engage in environmentally responsible disposal practices, hinder such progress.

“They’re skimming off the computers, cellphones and printers that can be recycled profitably because they have more precious metals,” said Karrie Gibson, the chief executive of Vintage Tech Recyclers. “Then they stockpile the CRTs, or dump it in landfills or abroad.”

The sheer quantity of the glass accumulating at some recycling plants has contributed to environmental and workplace safety problems. In Yuma, Ariz., for example, Dlubak Glass, one of the country’s largest recyclers of glass from televisions and monitors, found itself overwhelmed.

When state regulators visited the site in 2009, they found a mountain of the lead-rich glass, several stories tall. Dust from the shimmering mound of recycled glass had contaminated the surrounding soil, including a nearby orchard, with lead at 75 times the federal limit, according to state documents.

“We have it entirely under control now,” said Herb Schall, a Dlubak plant manager.

In September, California passed an emergency measure allowing companies to send monitors and televisions to hazardous landfills for the next two years.

Charlotte Fadipe, a spokeswoman for the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, said her office’s investigation of the abandoned warehouse near Fresno is continuing, and investigators are still trying to locate Charles Li, the owner of the company, TRI Products.

Over the past four years, TRI has been paid more than $1 million by the state to recycle electronic waste from local schools, hospitals and federal agencies, including the F.B.I., the I.R.S. and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, according to state and company documents.

After a reporter found him to be running another electronic waste disposal company, Mr. Li did not respond. But when he was contacted online by another recycler and asked whether he was still looking to buy electronic waste, he immediately replied yes, with one caveat.

“Right now, we can take PC, server, telephone, printer and household e-waste,” he wrote. “I cannot take your CRT/TV as e-waste because we don’t have equipment to recycle the tubes.”


A version of this article appeared in print on March 19, 2013, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Unwanted Electronic Gear Rising in Toxic Piles.
Etiquetado , , , ,

Las chicas bravas

Las Chicas Bravas

Story by Robert Rappaport

last modified mayo 1, 2010

Download as MP3

Recycling cooperative worker A group of women in Mexico is trying to improve the town’s economic situation by taking part in a bi-national effort to recycle television sets, computers and other electronics and the digital transition in the United States is working in their favor.

The women live in the small community of Fronteras in the state of Sonora, south of Douglas, Arizona. The women formed a cooperative to achieve their goals and they have been so persistent and driven that they have been nicknamed in Spanish as “Las Chicas Bravas” or the “The Tough Women.” Tony Paniagua speaks with two of them as well as a couple of assistant volunteers and the president of a Vermont company that is a vital link in the recycling efforts.

Recycling copper Tucson Clean and Beautiful recently was there to take a look at the operation and TVs collected in Arizona will be going to Fronteras, where they will be sold if in good condition in Mexico, or else be disassembled for materials like copper and lead.

The digital transition in the United States means that thousands of analog televisions will be replaced and since Mexico is not going digital, the market for them is much better.
Watch Video of the Story:

Etiquetado , , ,